you quite simply cannot use this as last. so it depends really.hope this helps!īlackout, You saying I should try the Oxford Limiter instead to see if it works better on a particular track?hey Dan, the inflator doesnt have a "finalize" section in it. but on something more beautiful like a Kaskade track its got no-where to "hide" its distortion (if that makes any sense?) and it shows up much worse. On an EDM track with lots of hissing lead Tiesto lines and dirty synths it also sounds good. it seems to disguise its distortion in the guitars and gets away with it. I think the FG-X is more tuned for rock stuff. These days i know them both so well i can usually tell which one will work better already. so if im going for the Inflator i try FG-X first, then swap to L2 instead if its a no-go. Nothing gets louder than FG-X imho.sometimes it drives a track to new levels i never thought possible, but other times (on more minimal tracks without stabs) it just distorts and sounds bad. So i usually try the Oxford Limiter and then if it sounds too crunchy or distorted i use the Inflator instead, and if im using the inflator i finish with waves L2 or slate digital FG-X.
sometimes one just sounds better on a particular track than the other, dont know why, its down to the selection of sounds for that track i guess. Hey guys can we agree to disagree and get back to sharing tips on how we use the plugins for EDM? PeaceĪny other hot tips and workflows? I for one could not do without the Inflator and SPL Transient Designer in my Deep House mixes.hehe cool lets move on.i tend to use Oxford Limiter with the "Enhance" fader pushed right up to 105% at the very top.OR the inflator.
0 kommentar(er)
